Fact Sheet: Gender-Based Persecution



    The Committee for Humanitarian Assistance to Iranian Refugees (CHAIR) has compiled this fact sheet to disseminate information from publicly available sources on issues related to the status of women in Iran and their claims for protection as refugees/asylees.


    Although more than 80 percent of the world's refugees are women and their children, women face particular difficulties in obtaining refugee and/or asylee status. Their refugee claims have traditionally been ignored or excused through "cultural relativism," i.e., violations of their human rights have often been dismissed as private incidents specific to a particular culture, religion or political regime, and therefore not subject to international standards. Only recently, after pressure from refugees, asylum-seekers and advocates has the international community begun to recognize women's claims of persecution based on their gender as a legitimate basis for protection in the form of refugee status. The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) issued a set of guidelines for evaluating gender-based asylum claims in 1991; the Canadian Immigration and Refugee Board produced its guidelines in 1993; and the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) established
    its guidelines in 1995. This fact sheet discusses gender-based persecution as it relates to Iranian women.


    I. What is Gender-Based Persecution?
    Persecution, or oppressive, harmful or abusive treatment, based on one's gender can be broadly categorized into two types: 

        1. Acts that are female-specific or are targeted toward women because of their sex

    A. Sexual Discrimination

    In Iran, gender-based persecution takes the form of discriminatory national laws. Sexual discrimination in Iran is practiced in virtually all sectors of society–the home, workplace, courts–as it is institutionalized in the constitution and civil and penal codes. Examples include: 

    a. unequal rights to divorce and custody (a women must prove that the marriage is in violation of one of 12 grounds to be able to sue for divorce, and she automatically loses custody of her children when they reach a certain age); 
    b. prohibition from entering certain professional and educational fields;
    c. segregation on buses, in classrooms, in certain sports activities and building entrances.1 


    B. Imputed Persecution

    Many Iranian women are threatened, detained, tortured or killed because of their relationships with men who are themselves persecuted. They are targeted because their male relative’s political beliefs are attributed to them, or to threaten the male relative or to force her to concede information.


    C. Sexual Violence

    Violence against women is a form of persecution "when it is used by or with the consent or acquiescence  of those acting in an official capacity to intimidate or to punish." A government's failure to protect a woman survivor of violence renders it an agent of persecution.2  In Iran, domestic abuse, including marital rape, is traditionally tolerated as a husband's right. Therefore, survivors of abuse cannot rely on the courts or police for legal redress or protection.


    D. Other Examples

    Female genital mutilation, dowry deaths, sexual slavery, infanticide, forced marriage, forced sterilization, forced abortion, and all forms of sexual assault, including rape, as tools of repression and torture, during peacetime and war.  


        2. Penalties imposed because of a woman's transgression of social norms by refusing to comply with      restrictions on the rights and activities of women 

    The UNHCR guidelines promote recognition of persecution of women in a country "where [the] government cannot or will not protect women who are subject to abuse for disobeying social standards. The government need not itself have been the instigator of the abuse."3 In this type of persecution, Iranian refugee women have the compounded burden of proving that the treatment they received at the hands of officials or communities constitutes a pattern of violations, and not random, isolated incidents of criminal indictments. Iranian refugee women must successfully distinguish between "persecution" and "prosecution." Examples of transgressions in Iran include: intentionally or inadvertently contravening the dress code (including cosmetics, nail polish, and perfume); any association with men outside marriage; marrying a non-Muslim; travelling alone, inside or outside the country as a single woman, or as a married woman without the permission of the husband; riding a bicycle in public.

    II. The Refugee Definition

    "Gender" is not an enumerated ground in either the UN or U.S. definition of "refugee." According to the UN 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, and to the U.S. Refugee Act of 1980, a refugee is "any person who is outside any country of her/his nationality. . . who is unable or unwilling to avail him/herself of the protection of that country because of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion."4 Iranian women who have transgressed discriminatory laws or customs, faced imputed persecution, or suffered domestic violence find it difficult to prove persecution based on those five grounds. 


    1. Membership in a Particular Social Group

    The ground most often used in gender-based asylum claims is "membership in a particular social
    group." 

    a. The UNHCR in its guidelines also promotes "acceptance of the principle that women
    fearing persecution or severe discrimination on the basis of their gender should be
    considered a member of a social group for the purposes of determining refugee
    status."5

    b. The Canadian guidelines recognize those women who transgress discriminatory laws
    or customs as a gender-defined social group, and expands this social group to include
    survivors of sexual assault, domestic violence and sexual discrimination. ". . . [T]he
    woman will need to show that she has a genuine fear of harm, that her gender is the
    reason for her feared harm, that the harm is sufficiently serious to amount to
    persecution, that there is reasonable possibility for the fear of persecution to occur if she
    returns to her country of origin and she has no reasonable expectation of adequate
    national protection."6

    c. The INS guidelines, however, do not expound the grounds specified in the refugee
    definition, but stipulate that the violence must not be "purely personal."7

    2. Political Opinion

    A woman threatened because of her feminist views may be eligible for asylum due to
    persecution based on the ground of political opinion. The UNHCR and Canadian
    Immigration Board recognize women's opposition to oppressive laws and customs
    imposed on women as political statements. Therefore, The INS asylum guidelines
    include no explicit statement in this regard. Nevertheless, the Third Circuit federal court
    in a 1993 case recognized that an Iranian asylum applicant’s feminist opposition to the
    Islamic regime was an expression of a political opinion, and therefore she could be
    persecuted. The court did not grant her asylum, however, because she failed to prove
    that she would be persecuted if returned to Iran.




    Sources:
    1. "Fact Sheet: The Status of Women in Iran," CHAIR, New York, 1996.
    2. Guidelines on the Protection of Refugee Women (hereinafter UNHCR Guidelines), UNHCR, Geneva, 1991, p. 40.
    3. UNHCR Guidelines, p.41.
    4. United States Refugee Act of 1980, § 201.
    5. UNHCR Guidelines, p. 40.
    6. "Women Refugee Claimants Fearing Gender-Related Persecution," Guidelines: Issued By the Chairperson Pursuant to § 65 (3) of the Immigration and Refugee Board,
    Ottowa, 1993, p. 6.
    7. "Exhibit 6: INS Gender Asylum Fact Sheet and Guidelines, May 26, 1995," AILA Monthly, July/August, 1995.
    8. Cited in Kristin Kandt, "United States Asylum Law: Recognizing Persecution Based on Gender Using Canada as a Comparison," Georgetown Immigration Law Journal,
    Winter 1995.

    November 1996