Shut Yarl's Wood Down
Maryam Namazie
February 18, 2002
One quarter to a half of Yarl's
Wood prison located in Bedfordshire, which was opened 13 weeks ago on the site
of a former UK Ministry of Defence base, was burned down by a fire that began
on 14 February. With several of the
'detainees' unaccounted for, there is serious concern that some may have been
wounded or even killed as a result. If so, they will become the latest victims
and human tragedies of Fortress UK.
Billed as the largest immigration
'detention centre' in Europe, Yarl's Wood was an important part of the
government's programme to expedite and increase deportations from the UK. Information received on the treatment of the
'detainees' reveals the extent of the government's brutality towards people who
have fled persecution and repression. According
to the Campaign Against Arbitrary Detention at Yarl's
Wood: 'Many fire-fighters expressed their shock at the treatment of detainees
by Group 4 staff [the private company running the prison for the immigration
service] and police. They described people being herded like animals
through the locked building. After being left to stand in the cold,
detainees were handcuffed to the seat rails on the busses that took them away
from the detention centre. Sources reveal that fire-fighters had to bring
in special equipment to tear down doors that were otherwise impenetrable.
…Fire fighters were prevented by Group 4 and the police from entering the
locked, burning buildings to check for trapped detainees...'
Though there has been no definitive
statement by the UK Home Office, many groups have commented on the cause of the
fire and suggested solutions. The GMB
union, which represents 170 staff at Yarl's Wood, and others blame the fire and
'riot' on insufficient training and understaffing. Others highlight poor
conditions such as the fact that the Category B prison complex was built too
hastily and had no sprinkler system, that Group 4 treated 'detainees' unfairly,
had an appalling record and failed to deploy staff effectively. They add that
Group 4, like all other private companies, ran this centre for profit, which is
why they were prepared to leave it under-staffed and sprinkler free.
While some of the issues raised against
Yarl's Wood are justified and some of the recommendations legitimate, they nonetheless
fail to address the root reason for the occurrence and give real solutions. Would, for example, sufficient training and
staffing really solve the problem? If enough
sprinklers were put in place, if detainees were not mistreated and the
government ran the prison instead of Group 4, what then? Would everything
be okay if detention was no longer arbitrary?
What if a full independent public inquiry into the events leading up to the
incident took place and an explanation was given as to why Group 4 ignored Fire
Authority recommendations to install a sprinkler system and had so few staff on
duty? Would the fires and riots and
deaths end? Of course they
wouldn't. These suggested measures are
like calling for a moratorium on the death penalty in the US until the USA
government can ensure that executions are not racially biased, rather than
calling for an end to executions, full stop.
Nothing the UK government can do
will stop these tragedies short of shutting down Yarl's Wood and all 'detention
centres'. This is where the real debate
and solution lies. No government can
imprison people for being homeless - it's unacceptable in this day and
age. Likewise, no government should be
allowed to imprison migrants who are homeless and unable and unwilling to
return to their 'homes.' The people who
are imprisoned in Yarl's Wood and other prisons, are not detainees, they are
prisoners of conscience. Yarl's Wood is
not a 'detention centre' but a prison and concentration camp. The prisoners are not violent and criminal,
but persons who have fled criminal and violent regimes, many of them supported
by the UK government. The Islamic regime
in Iran is a good case in point.
Moreover, it is the UK government's policy of detention and deportation that
is violent and criminal.
Like in Australia, this 'problem'
won't be resolved by rebuilding Yarl's Wood, adding more detention centres and
expediting and increasing deportations as Home Secretary Blunkett's White Paper
suggests. Like in Australia, the problem will only escalate until we too
witness sewn lips and increased suicides.
A principled approach and solution to Yarl's Wood and
all other so-called centres is to demand an end to them and deportation of migrants,
full stop.